Whip Pan to the Door
How do FastH3 V2, Seedance 2.5, Kling 3.0 Turbo and 33 other AI video models handle a camera control prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 36 clips side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
A whip pan inside an office: the shot starts sharp and steady on a ringing desk phone, whips left across the room in a motion blur, and lands sharp and steady on a door that swings open as the pan arrives. Blur only during the whip, both ends held still, one continuous take.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The pan never cleanly lands as the door visibly swings open.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The whip pan settles on the door, but the door never opens.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The sequence is complete, but the pan is uneven and directionally unclear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A strong whip-pan-to-opening-door sequence with ambiguous pan direction.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A strong whip pan resolves sharply on the door as it opens.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The door opening lags the whip-pan landing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
It reaches the door, but lacks a decisive whip and synchronized opening.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The full phone, whip-pan, and opening-door progression is clear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Clear phone-to-pan-to-opening-door chain with a slightly abrupt arrival.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Cinematic pan lands cleanly, but the opening-door action is weak.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The door never clearly swings open on arrival.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The door opens, but both focus control and the final framing are imperfect.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The final closed-door reversal breaks the intended opening-door endpoint.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The full action chain reads clearly, with mild synthetic warping during the pan.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A clear phone start is undermined by a soft, non-opening door finish.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A convincing continuous whip pan lands on the door opening.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The whip pan is clear, but the final door does not visibly swing open.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The camera move is clean, but the door is shown open rather than clearly swinging.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
It completes the phone-to-door sequence but the pan continuity is jumpy.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A clean whip-pan sequence with a sharp final opening-door landing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The phone and pan work, but the final door never visibly opens.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The whip pan is badly undermined by extreme rubbery phone-cord deformation.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A spurious pan-and-cord prop overwhelms the requested action.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The phone and pan are present, but the door never visibly swings open.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Clean phone-to-door whip pan with a clearly opening door.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
It pans through a corridor but never establishes the phone or opening door.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The door opens, but the clip never performs the whip pan.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The whip-pan concept lands, but mid-pan warping weakens continuity.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The intended phone-to-door move is complete, with slight softness on arrival.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
A very clean whip-pan progression that lands convincingly on the opening door.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The shot cleanly resolves from the phone through the pan to an opening door.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The requested whip pan and door-opening payoff never occur.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Severe trailing cord artifacts and a closed final door spoil the shot.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The door opens, but the move lacks the requested sharp-to-blur-to-sharp structure.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The door-opening beat is present, but the final landing retains blur.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The blurred pan never resolves into a sharp opening-door landing.





