Second Floor Next Week
How do FastH3 V2, Seedance 2.5, Kling 3.0 Turbo and 33 other AI video models handle a talking head & lip sync prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 36 clips side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Shoulders-up shot of a man in a hard hat on a building site who points over his shoulder at the structure behind him and says: "The second floor goes up next week." Spoken audio with natural lip sync, wind and site noise underneath, bright overcast daylight.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clear over-the-shoulder pointing gesture with matching spoken line.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The delayed pointing gesture is clear, but the required audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The thumb-over-shoulder gesture reads, but speech and audio are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The pointing and visible talking work well, but the required audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
A clean, realistic backward point and site setting are undercut by absent speech.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The over-shoulder point and visible talking are strong, but the required audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The presenter gesture and lip movement are convincing, but the required audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The gesture and site are clear, but the required spoken audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
A stable realistic site presentation with a clear point, but the dialogue is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Speech is exact, but the backward gesture is a weak fist rather than a clear point.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The pointing action reads clearly, but the required speech is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The action and exact line are present, with softer dynamic motion and warmer-than-overcast light.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The close construction portrait looks excellent, though speech audio is absent and the hand softens.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
A believable pointing performance is undermined by the final rear-facing continuity jump.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Clear sustained over-shoulder pointing, but the required spoken line is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The turn and sustained point are coherent, but no required dialogue is present.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The spoken line, gesture, PPE and construction setting all land cleanly.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The sustained point and site look are good, but the action is somewhat jumpy and too wide.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The gesture and visible speech are strong, but no required audio is present.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.5
It includes the target line, but substantial unrelated speech precedes it.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The construction gesture is clear, but the spoken content is unrelated to the requested line.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The clean pointing shot is too wide and has no required spoken audio.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The gesture is clear, but garbled overlays and missing speech hurt the result.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
A plausible site gesture, but arm ghosting and absent speech weaken the result.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A clean close-up with the exact line and a readable over-shoulder building gesture.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The pointing action reads, but harsh backlight and absent speech miss key requirements.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
It gestures toward the structure, but the required spoken audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Clear site gesture, but the required spoken line is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Pointing action is clear, but speech and its required audio are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Tight edge cropping and a blurred, discontinuous pointing arm weaken the take.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The requested pointing performance is clear, but the speech track is missing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The pointing action is clear, but the required spoken audio is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The pointing site scene works, but wide back-facing framing and garbled subtitles hurt it.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
A solid close construction shot with minor hand, face, and scaffolding instability.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The visual setup is strong, but no audio track supplies the requested spoken line.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Clear over-shoulder point, but the clip has no spoken audio.
