At a sunny park picnic table, a hand pours pale lemonade from a clear glass pitcher into two ice-filled glasses; lemon slices bob and mint leaves swirl. Another hand slides a striped napkin into place. Close tabletop framing, sparkling liquid, natural outdoor shadows.

Food & Lifestyle · default settings, one run, 5 s, 720p, 16:9 · Updated September 15, 2026

Not run yet
MiniMax FastH3 V2
P-Video 2 Pro
4.2videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.0
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio3.5

The lemonade pour, ice, citrus, mint, and sunlit tabletop are especially well resolved.

Wan 3.0
4.1videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.0
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio3.5

The pour, ice, citrus, and garden lighting are exceptionally clean and readable.

Wan 3.0 Prime
4.5videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.5
  • Motion & consistency4.5
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

Pouring action reads clearly and cleanly.

FastH3 V2
4.4videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence5.0
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

All requested picnic actions are clearly present.

Seedance 2.5
4.1videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

Polished food imagery, though only one glass receives a clearly shown pour.

Seedance 2.0
3.5videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio2.5

The pitcher action is intermittent, making the intended pour less convincing.

Seedance 2.0 Fast
3.4videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail3.5
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

Only the left glass is visibly filled, with jumpy pouring continuity.

Kling 3.0 Turbo
3.8videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

Attractive drink detail, but the action mainly fills one glass and cuts abruptly.

Veo 3.1
4.2videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.0
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The second glass does not clearly receive its own pour.

Veo 3.1 Fast
3.9videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The polished pour fills only one glass rather than both.

Happy Horse 1.1
3.9videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The napkin action lands well, but the second-glass pour is not shown.

MiniMax H3
3.7videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The central pour does not clearly fill both glasses.

Gemini Omni Flash
3.8videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The striped napkin placement is visible but its slide is not evidenced.

Wan 2.7
3.6videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The finished picnic tableau is visually strong, though the pour and object physics remain somewhat synthetic.

Grok Imagine Video
3.7videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio1.0

Clear pouring and napkin placement, though garnish movement is understated.

P-Video 2
3.3videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio1.0

Only one of the two ice-filled glasses receives lemonade.

Runway Gen-4.5
3.9videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

Strong picnic staging, but the pour and pitcher break continuity late.

Hailuo 2.3
3.8videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

A clean outdoor setup, but only one glass is clearly poured into.

Kling 2.6
4.0videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

It completes both pours and napkin placement, with visible motion ghosting.

FLUX 3
3.7videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

Warm, polished tabletop scene, but only one glass is visibly poured.

PixVerse V5
3.9videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The second glass is present but not visibly filled by the pour.

Seedance 1.5 Pro
3.3videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency2.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics2.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio2.5

Garnish and liquid continuity jump visibly between frames.

FastH3
3.6videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

Attractive picnic tableau, but only one glass is clearly poured and the liquid motion is inconsistent.

Cosmos 3 Super
3.5videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The pour and outdoor styling read well, though the secondary napkin action is awkward and incomplete.

Lance
3.0videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency2.0
  • Camera & framing3.5
  • Quality & detail3.5
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics2.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The sunny lemonade scene is attractive, but object teleportation and unclear hand action undermine it.

Wan T2V
3.8videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.0
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

A polished, complete tabletop pour with a believable finished setup, tempered by jumpy hand and pitcher motion.

HunyuanVideo 1.5
4.1videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

Only one glass visibly receives the lemonade pour.

Happy Horse 1.0
3.6videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio4.0

The right glass is never filled.

Helios 14B
2.9videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence2.5
  • Motion & consistency2.5
  • Camera & framing3.5
  • Quality & detail3.5
  • Look & lighting3.5
  • Realism & physics2.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The prompt multi-step glass-pouring action is not convincingly shown.

Seedance 1.0 Pro Fast
3.8videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence—
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting3.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

It renders an unrelated spaghetti cooking scene instead of lemonade.

Wan 2.6
3.5videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The bright picnic pour is on-brief, but repetitive motion and abrupt prop changes reduce believability.

Kling 3.0 Omni
3.9videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.5
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The pour reaches only one glass rather than both.

P-Video
3.1videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence2.5
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing3.5
  • Quality & detail3.5
  • Look & lighting3.5
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The central two-glass pouring sequence is weak or incomplete.

Kling 2.5 Turbo
4.2videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence4.5
  • Motion & consistency4.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics4.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

It completes the full two-glass pour sequence cleanly.

Seedance 1.0 Pro
3.7videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.5
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The two-glass pour sequence is not fully demonstrated.

PixVerse V4.5
3.2videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency2.5
  • Camera & framing3.5
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics2.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The pour is clear, but the napkin interaction becomes implausible and breaks continuity.

PixVerse V4
3.8videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.5
  • Realism & physics3.5
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The pour focuses on one glass, leaving the second static.

Hailuo 02
3.5videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.5
  • Motion & consistency3.0
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The continuous lemonade pour and sunny table work, but the napkin action is not clearly completed.

Hailuo 01 Director
3.5videomodels.ai score
  • Prompt adherence3.0
  • Motion & consistency3.5
  • Camera & framing4.0
  • Quality & detail4.0
  • Look & lighting4.0
  • Realism & physics3.0
  • Text rendering—
  • Audio—

The requested two-glass pouring action is incomplete.