Sparkling Water Can Turntable
How do P-Video 2 Pro, Wan 3.0, FastH3 V2 and 36 other AI video models handle a product videos prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 39 clips side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
A matte silver sparkling-water can rotates clockwise on a white studio turntable. Its front label remains sharp and readable: "LIME FIZZ" above "SPARKLING WATER". Condensation beads slide downward as a lime wedge rolls into frame. Softbox lighting, clean seamless background, locked camera.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Sharp, stable label and condensation on a convincing turntable, but the lime is already in place rather than rolling in.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Audio—
The can render is clean, but the required label text is not preserved.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Audio—
Small label text is garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Audio—
The label becomes cropped and the framing changes despite the locked-camera instruction.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Audio—
The incorrect morphing label and lime transformation break the requested product sequence.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The lime wedge is present from the opening frame rather than rolling into view.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The lime never clearly rolls into frame.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Clean studio rotation and lime entry, but label and condensation subtly flicker.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★2.5
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★1.0
The lime slides in but does not convincingly roll.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
Frames could not be inspected reliably.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
The rotation is clean, but the lime teleports and the tiny label is not reliably readable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Audio—
Garbled changing text and morphing lime pieces make this fail the specified product presentation.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The clean rotating can works, but the label is often hidden and the lime movement is jumpy.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
The can and lime wobble and morph instead of completing the clean product action.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
It generates a bottle rather than the requested can, with lime and label morphing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The requested label and running condensation read well, but the lime never rolls into frame.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Audio—
A polished turntable shot is undermined by the wrong label and a visibly hand-guided lime.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Audio—
The generated glass jar and illegible label miss the requested silver can branding.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Audio—
Lime motion floats and condensation never visibly slides.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Audio—
The complete turntable and lime sequence lands, but the secondary label text remains corrupted.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The label and studio look are strong, but the lime jumps and condensation does not visibly slide.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Audio—
The silver can rotates cleanly, but no lime wedge enters and the small label text is wrong.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Audio—
Required label text is garbled throughout.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Audio—
The lime appears abruptly at frame edge rather than rolling into view.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Audio—
Required lower label text is corrupted and motion is abrupt.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The required label text is absent and the lime motion jumps.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The label never contains the required words.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
Label text warps and the lime does not roll naturally.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Audio—
Attractive locked product shot but the exact label and condensation action fail.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Audio—
Strong studio shot, but the lower label and condensation action are missing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Audio—
The lime is already in frame instead of rolling in later.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Audio—
The required two-line label is never fully readable.





