Storm Coast Wave Study
How do P-Video 2 Pro, Wan 3.0, FastH3 V2 and 36 other AI video models handle a nature & landscape prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 39 clips side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Aerial view gliding sideways along a rugged black-rock coastline during a windy overcast afternoon. A large wave crashes into a narrow sea arch, white spray blows inland, then recedes through tide pools as two seabirds cross the frame. Natural water physics, stable geology, continuous motion.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Stable aerial coast glide with convincing waves, sea arch, and birds, but little visible rain.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Strong coastal motion and water physics; the sea arch and two-bird detail are a little soft.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Strong coastal physics, with only a slight camera-direction mismatch.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The full wave-impact chain is clear and the lateral aerial motion stays coherent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The full crash sequence reads well, though spray and bird continuity are soft.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The coast and wave progression are convincing, but the arch and two-bird crossing remain unclear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The stormy coast looks good, but the narrow arch and bird crossing are not clearly delivered.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Two birds and the arch sequence are present, but foam and spray jump between frames.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Water, arch, and recession are convincing, but the required two-bird crossing never appears.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The arch crash and two birds land, but the tide-pool recession is weak and spray is smooth.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The complete wave sequence is strong, but one seabird is visibly soft and oversized.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Strong coastal realism, but the tide-pool recession and two birds are not fully clear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
It delivers the whole storm-coast chain, with only soft ghosting around birds and spray.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A very coherent wave-to-tide-pool progression with the required birds and lateral glide.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
All requested beats land cleanly with notably convincing wave and spray physics.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Storm surf and recession work well, but the arch and two-bird crossing are not clearly delivered.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The full sequence and lateral glide land, but close seabirds are stretched and unnatural.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Dramatic wave action is undermined by unstable rock, foam, bird, and camera continuity.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The crash sequence is coherent, but two distinct birds and detailed pool drainage remain unclear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Every requested beat, including the arch, recession, and two birds, is clearly present.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The dark coastal glide and wave read well, but the narrow arch is unclear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A convincing arch impact, but the required seabirds never appear and foam is overly smooth.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The wave, spray, pools, and lateral aerial move work well, but birds are not discernible.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Birds arrive, but their abrupt scaling and the unclear arch weaken the action chain.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The arch impact reads well, but birds and clear tide-pool recession are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The scene lacks the required sea arch and clearly crossing pair of birds.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The aerial coastal move is present, but there is no arch or bird pair and water flickers.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The crash, spray, pools, and birds appear, but the sea arch is missing and the bird motion feels artificial.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Smooth lateral drone motion and coherent surf make this a strong coastal study.
- Prompt adherence—
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
It is a sunny lemonade-pouring scene rather than the requested moving storm-coast sequence.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The arch and receding water work, but only one obvious bird crosses.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Tide-pool drainage is clear, but the required sea arch and birds never appear.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
Strong arch-and-surf sequence, but the camera advances more than it tracks sideways.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The aerial coastal action is strong, though the narrow arch is indistinct and too many birds cross.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The sideways glide and decisive wave impact into a narrow arch are not clearly delivered.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The sequence delivers every major beat, with extra oversized birds the only clear mismatch.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The lateral coastal glide and crashing surf are unusually coherent and polished.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The glide, wave, spray, and recession read, but the sea arch and seabirds are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Motion & consistency★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Camera & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & physics★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
- Audio—
The arch fly-through is cinematic, though it departs from a purely sideways glide.
